The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this is going to be changing but at this point in time it's basically something we measure to determine risk after which point we don't really need to measure it we've established risk and now we need to take measures elsewhere
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the lpa didn't double and it's remarkably stable uh over time so most guidelines will probably tell you just to measure lpa once in a lifetime and it's relatively relatively stable