The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the body doesn't sit still and I want to make another point which is people again might be listening and saying you know Peter man it's too much data dude just go out there and do it and and I'll I'll give you the counterargument to that when I was a competitive athlete and I was training 28 hours a week I had the luxury of junk miles I didn't always have to be perfect but I'm not a competitive athlete I'm a competitive father
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.