The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it says my 10year risk of heart disease is 1.6% this is as a 45-year-old male with a total cholesterol of 250 and HDL of 65 and a systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 110 and 70 respectively I'm on no medications I do not have diabetes and I do not smoke
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.