The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So that's uh a pretty good product that is kind of a staple product for me. Uh I ran out of it. I kind of miss it. So I'm going to reminds me I have to go buy that. But it's been sort of what I sip on. I put that into my coffee and sort of when I'm working on grants or giving lectures, I just need long periods of cognitive.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.