The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is research to suggest it's mostly observational that elevated amounts of phosphorus in the human diet don't have great outcomes in humans so also consider on the flip side of that that calcium is essential for many of the reactions in the Krebs cycle a biochemical pathway at the center of our energy regulation in humans specifically enzymes pyruvate dehydrogenase alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase and isocitrate dehydrogenase are calcium-dependent enzymes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.