Peter Attia· MD
and the tumors were exactly the same size so it had nothing to do with the drug even though the drug was working on the target and molecule it wasn't the targeted molecule that was was responsible for this
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the tumors were exactly the same size so it had nothing to do with the drug even though the drug was working on the target and molecule it wasn't the targeted molecule that was was responsible for this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when we started to do this and realize that calorie restriction was shrinking these tumors down massively