Peter Attia· MD
when they started cr late in life there is a significant but not huge effect like the the magnitude of the lifespan extension is much less than in the mice that were on cr from three months of age
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when they started cr late in life there is a significant but not huge effect like the the magnitude of the lifespan extension is much less than in the mice that were on cr from three months of age
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the effect is pretty small compared to cr with rapamycin you get almost exactly the same benefit starting at 20 22 24 months as you do starting early in life
looking at the all cr all day mice looks like they had a maximum life span of just below call it 1400 and change with a median that i'm going to say was about 11.50 yeah so it's good good lifespan extension
those animals actually were longer lived than the mice that went on cr late in life