The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the pancreas spills into the portal vein which then goes into the river and so it's delivering a lot of its cells to the liver so it makes sense then that it tends to metastasize there if only because it's just sending a lot of cells there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so for example uh the you can see uh uh species being coming out of the Amazon they they're they they get onto you know just the Amazon collects uh uh trees and and things that are floating down the animals are on it and so they go out and then anything that's in front of the Amazon is going to be receiving more of these and um so more are more likely to see a metastatic you know monkey or or something like that from the middle of the Amazon but and so the the the pancreas uh spills into the portal vein which then goes into the liver and so it's delivering a lot of its cells to the liver so it makes sense then that it t to metastasize there if only because it's just sending a lot of cells there
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.