Paul Saladino· MD
they're also dumping out lactate which acidify as a micro environment and that facilitates the invasion and metastatic process
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
they're also dumping out lactate which acidify as a micro environment and that facilitates the invasion and metastatic process
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Cancers produce a large amounts of lactate, which is also responsible of the famous microenvironment that a lot of people are talking about nowadays. The lactate microenvironment, I mean the microenvironment of cancer cells, is more acidic than non-cancer cells, and it's a niche for carcinogenesis. The responsible for that microenvironment is lactate.
And now what we see is that lactate is a typical feature of cancers. Cancers produce a large amounts of lactate, which is also responsible of the famous microenvironment that a lot of people are talking about nowadays. The lactate microenvironment, I mean the microenvironment of cancer cells, is more acidic than non-cancer cells, and it's a niche for carcinogenesis. The responsible for that microenvironment is lactate.
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.