Peter Attia· MD
most of the people that it impacts are thin and in shape or athletes
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most of the people that it impacts are thin and in shape or athletes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
non-smoking lung cancer is growing at scary rates it's being diagnosed and it hits people in their prime it's growing rapidly especially in young women
non-smoking lung cancer is growing at scary rates it's being diagnosed and it hits people in their prime it's growing rapidly especially in young women so it's hitting a lot of moms much more common in women than it is in men although it does happen in men happens in caucasian and asian women predominantly and the interesting thing is most of the people that it impacts are thin and in shape or athletes
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.