so you know it makes a few percentage points difference as a preventative agent again the key Point here is the absolute risk for developing breast cancer in any given span of time is still pretty low following a diagnosis of lcis
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you know it makes a few percentage points difference as a preventative agent again the key Point here is the absolute risk for developing breast cancer in any given span of time is still pretty low following a diagnosis of lcis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I know their data ply well I don't don't have any other commercial conflicts of interest but I do work with the NSA so they did a study called the P1 study which was a prevention study the goal of this study which was published over 20 years ago was to see if Tom oopen could lower the risk of breast cancer diagnosis in women who were at intermediate to moderate risk of developing breast cancer and so in that trial they included a lot of women who had lobular carcinoma in saitu and those women were at greater risk of developing breast cancer so that risk just to be quantitative so I'm looking this up as I speak to you was there was a rate of 13 per per th000 women 13 per thousand women per year and tomox havean cut that in half down to about five or six per thousand women per year
so this study took women who were at high risk who had been diagnosed or had not yet been diagnosed with breast cancer so they had a higher RIS risk was family history yeah they had higher risk because of family history or because of atypical hyperplasia or other there was a whole algorithm that went into the risk assessment so wom higher risk these women took tamoxifen for how long five years versus a placebo
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.