Paul Saladino· MD
there were only 14 observational studies I believe give or take a few studies in that analysis they left out all of the Interventional studies they did not include any animal studies in the who judgment and eight of those 14 studies if I remember properly showed no association between red meat and cancer six did but only one of those six showed that that Association was statistically significant and that one study out of 14 is why the who believes that meat causes cancer that's crazy and that single one study was done in Loma Linda California which is a known Seventh-day Adventist Community a group where healthy user bias and unhealthy user bias are very strong because the mainstream narrative in Loma Linda is that if you are eating meat you are doing something that is bad for you and the people that are eating eating Loma Linda are very rebellious and in fact in that study you can see that the people who ate meat will also very much more likely to be obese and diabetic and unwell and yet that is where the association between red meat and cancer came from