The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
it's the fourth leading cause of cancer death in both men and women and yet by incidents it's a fraction of that right it's it just speaks to how lethal it is um you know the last time i looked josh i would say that adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is 95 lethal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
of the people diagnosed with adnoc carcinoma of the pancreas about 95% of those people will experience lethality within 5 years
I think fourth most common lethal GI cancer or something like fifth most common lethal cancer full stop not GI right so cause of death or cause of death yeah cause of death right it goes number one is lung number two breast and Co breast and prostate and then colon and then pancreas
right so cause of death cause of death yeah cause of death right it goes number one is lung number two breast and Co breast and prostate and then colon and then pancreas
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.