Peter Attia· MD
in both groups there was about a 133% Improvement in V2 Max a 34 4% Improvement in maximal workload so that's basically how many watts could you hit and then a 2.4 fold Improvement in endurance capacity
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in both groups there was about a 133% Improvement in V2 Max a 34 4% Improvement in maximal workload so that's basically how many watts could you hit and then a 2.4 fold Improvement in endurance capacity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so there was a study that did um a six week aerobic exercise they use cycling um training program to assess changes in um you know V2 Max oxygen consumption of course uh workload and endurance now in the old group these people averaged 880 years of age in the younger group The People averaged 24 years of age so you know you couldn't you know you couldn't be further apart and yet in both groups there was about a 133% Improvement in V2 Max a 34% Improvement in maximal workload so that's basically how many watts could you hit and then a 2.4 fold Improvement in endurance capacity