The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but you don't see it with exercise you don't see it with exercise you don't see it with the smoking studies in the opposite direction SM you don't see it with fiber the effect in fiber at least in terms of like cardiovascular disease cancer it is a very consistent effect and it's very very consistent even across all the metaanalyses I've seen
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.