The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even though the Whi was testing the most common formulations at that time in the early 1990s it did put an end to a practice of prescribing hormone therapy among women in later menopause for the purpose of preventing strokes and heart attacks and cognitive decline which actually were found in the Whi to be adversely affected by hormone therapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.