The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I was about to see a patient that I was being asked to consult on for milk allergy and he was in the ICU and I was told that he had just drank a cup of milk and had had a bad reaction by the time I arrived there the unfortunate event of his death had already occurred he was already being asked um his parents were already being asked to give consent for him to be a liver donor and so I took care of the the person that was the liver recipient who also had a milk allergy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.