The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is actually much evidence for reverse causality here which means tmao isn't doing that at all but many of the studies will suggest that we know that that that is clear that cmao is causing those problems when in fact what is actually represented in the literature is a correlation between tmao and things like heart attack stroke or kidney failure etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i am not familiar with a single study in humans showing the tmao causes any of those things