The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think a lot of people are not necessarily Pro lipid hypothesis but are Pro accelerant and that's what that kind of sounds like if you say okay the inflammatory response is the spark and the more LDL particles you have the bigger the fire is going to be because they are an accelerant the more LDL particles the more plaque you're going to have
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.