The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this one has that potential I think to be in the 1 to 2 I don't think this at all is going to be like 1918 because that was so unique and how it took out 18 to 30 year olds this one's not doing that this is going to clearly be associate with age and underlying health issues but in some ways we are a population that is highly vulnerable because of all the other lifestyle and health conditions that occur in our group
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.