The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so being a Jersey guy on my standard jokes on a lecture circuit was atherosclerosis is just the evidence of illegal dumping where a lipoprotein instead of bringing lipids whoever is supposed to be bringing it was bringing sterile city wall and over decades you got a problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and one of the places the lipoprotein should never deliver sterols to to any serious degree of course is your arterial wall intima
now that atherogenesis is certainly a sterol mediated disease but sterols are trafficked within april b containing lipoproteins which provides the vehicle that transports them into the artery wall where they can in some start a pathological process