Paul Saladino· MD
then one day a plaque ruptures you've got you know a thrombus here and then it plugs up your your entire Lumen and that's how you have a heart attack
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
then one day a plaque ruptures you've got you know a thrombus here and then it plugs up your your entire Lumen and that's how you have a heart attack
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
after it was agreed upon that a ruptured plaque led to a clot, the clot led to basically the absence of any blood flow distal to that clot. So beyond the clot, so then any tissue beyond that blockage would then be starved of oxygen.
99% of heart attacks in this country happened because of a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque.