The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what I took away from your work was no their genetic gift was a phase shift and when they got chronic diseases they still died of heart disease they still died of cancer they still died of Alzheimer's disease they simply got a 20-year bonus if not more maybe 29 on average you could calculate call it a close to 30 year bonus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the difference is they get those diseases twenty to twenty-five years later
their superpower is simply delaying the onset of bad things so it's not that they don't get heart attacks they just don't get them when they're 65. it's not that they don't get cancer they just don't get it when they're 60.