The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if a plaque ruptures and as you explained it the plotting system of the body responds in the way that it should respond when damage occurs if you for example cut your skin um but it turns out to be absolutely the worst thing the body could have done and in an ironic way the body kills itself this clotting response is what creates a sudden occlusion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that plaque can become very inflamed and rupture or erode and that sets off the coagulation system in the arteries which like a rapidly cause narrowing or obstruction of their coronary artery
and as you explained it the clotting system of the body responds in the way that it should respond when damage occurs if you for example cut your skin um but it turns out to be absolutely the worst thing the body could have done and in an ironic way the body kills it self this clotting response is what creates a sudden occlusion and if that occurs in the wrong part of the anatomy of the heart uh that that person will be dead within a matter of minutes uh if an intervention is not performed