The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when people were admitted for heart attacks for cardiovascular disease in the euro aspire study only about a third were known diabetics but when they looked for evidence of this metabolic syndrome this dysglycemia this un uh this un this perturbed handling of insulin and glucose 80 to 90 percent of people had it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.