The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
using a mathematical formula that I've you'll know the name of it I I'm blanking on it you can impute you can impute the diameter of the of the artery relative to the diameter of the unobstructed artery or the garden hose in this case uh and so that kind of gives you a way to uh to get at the severity of the of the blockage
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.