The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
exactly so there's not really good evidence showing that lpa is associated with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis because we we're studying genes that that are associated with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis and we don't see really an effect of of lpa there now that being said it might accelerate the uh the formation of aortic stenosis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves who are already at risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.