Paul Saladino· MD
they don't know that the food is not nutritious they don't know that the food is giving them diabetes and heart problems and all these other issues that hunter-gatherers never have to deal with
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they don't know that the food is not nutritious they don't know that the food is giving them diabetes and heart problems and all these other issues that hunter-gatherers never have to deal with
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.