The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the the calcification of the artery per se isn't necessarily the thing that's going to kill a person but it's indicative of very Advanced disease and if you see calcification in one part of an artery it's quite likely that you have less remodeled plaque elsewhere in the in the coronary artery system
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the the calcification of the artery per se isn't necessarily the thing that's going to kill a person but it's indicative of very Advanced disease and if you see calcification in one part of an artery it's quite likely that you have less uh remodeled plaque elsewhere in the in the coronary artery system and and in fact those could be the ones that are at higher risk