Rhonda Patrick· PhD
You want to be long but not as extremely long if you want to kind of have the best ratio of low risk for degenerative diseases like dementia and heart disease, and low risk for cancer.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You want to be long but not as extremely long if you want to kind of have the best ratio of low risk for degenerative diseases like dementia and heart disease, and low risk for cancer.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.