Paul Saladino· MD
Due to higher pressures in the arterial circulation, arteries are much more likely to be damaged.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Due to higher pressures in the arterial circulation, arteries are much more likely to be damaged.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we talked about this a little bit before we jumped on the fact that there is no such thing as atherosclerosis in veins and at the Rose School roses only happens in arteries and what we know is that arteries and veins are both blood vessels and the arterial wall is a little different than the venous wall but if anything the major difference is the amount of pressure in the arteries the vein and what we see a lot of times for atherosclerosis is they happen in arterial bifurcations where there's probably scorpions and so I think this is actually really compelling and and compatible with what you're saying the idea that perhaps it's in arteries where there's higher pressure that you're getting more turbulent blood flow this could be happening at arterial bifurcations that is causing injury to the arterial wall