The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other side of the argument on seed oils which I plan to address as best I can is that there are larger randomized controlled Trials of humans that do show that with increased ing seed oil consumption there is uh no no harm but no benefit uh no no benefit but no harm of increasing seed oils in terms of cardiovascular outcomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.