The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
obviously things like smoking or crazy high levels of risk for cardiovascular disease that brings in a lot of free radicals so you get an injury that is supposed to be repaired and for which we seem to have plenty of processes in place to handle the repair effectively most of the time until we don't until there actually is an issue with the reparative process
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.