Peter Attia· MD
that again yeah stands in the face of the traditional teaching that we had which was stages 1 2 3 reversible stage four not
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that again yeah stands in the face of the traditional teaching that we had which was stages 1 2 3 reversible stage four not
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then the second is that even at least a subset of therosis might be reversible