The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And it really was the work of Michael Davies in the late 1970s and early 1980s that kind of demonstrated, proved the idea that this was actually causal. And then early 1980s, I think it was, I can't remember the exact trial. They went in and actually aspirated out clots and people who showed up in the emergency department with, with a heart attack. And those people got better.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.