The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
over time this deposition of cholesterol has two things that can happen it can build up and the artery Lumen starts to narrow narrow which would interrupt the blood flow but all too often probably more often is the deposition of cholesterol in the artery wall and those collections are called plaque that plaque can become very inflamed and rupture and that sets off the coagulation system in the arteries which like a rapidly cause narrowing or obstruction of that coronary artery
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.