The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the Dutch criteria might be the most rigorous is that there's the Simon broom criteria there is the who criteria and the Dutch lipid clinic now the Dutch lipid Clinic criteria were put together by one of my co-workers Peter Landsberg and this set of criteria was externally and internally validated with mutations and huge numbers and every time you do a comparison between the Dutch and the rest the Dutch are winning in terms of their power to predict FH
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.