The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
women could not have a prior history of breast cancer endometrial cancer or any other estrogen sensitive cancers and overall if they had cancer it had to be could not be estrogen sensitive cancer and it had to be more than 10 years previously women could not have a recent heart attack or stroke or any of those major clinical cardiovascular events
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
although a very small percentage of the women did have a more remote history of heart attack stroke bypass surgery that type of clinical history for the most part the women were healthy in terms of past history of cardiovascular disease cancer other conditions they were certainly allowed to have diabetes hypertension high cholesterol