The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so a negative calcium score meaning a calcium score of zero absolutely means actuarially at the population level a lower risk of a coronary event and when we say coronary event we're the term ace is what we use to describe it may a major adverse coronary event or cardiac event so heart attack stroke or cardiac death
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.