Paul Saladino· MD
flip it panel gives you like marginal amount of information overall and you have to interpret it in terms of all of the values and relationship to each other instead of just o ll's high and that
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
flip it panel gives you like marginal amount of information overall and you have to interpret it in terms of all of the values and relationship to each other instead of just o ll's high and that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
obviously people who have heard me talk about this before will know that that tells us virtually nothing your total cholesterol is of no interest your LDL cholesterol at 131 by the framingham puts you a little over the 50th percentile your HDL cholesterol of 40 puts you quite a bit below that actually and your Triggs of 80 in someone who's Caucasian doesn't give us a great insight gives us even less insight if you were african-american but your trig to HDL ratio of about two would be considered acceptable by most most people would even consider up to three acceptable