We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
there's a uh group of very committed uh whatever you want to call them calcium scanography score of zero is Meaningful no matter where it comes but I just think that defies logic right you you shouldn't have any if you shouldn't have any calcium when you're 20
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think you know a calcium scan and a 25y old is probably not worth anything it's just not worth doing