We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I am not convinced by Dave's model and again truthfully I came into this maybe 20% thinking that there was a chance I would find the the argument convincing but I left with that number being a lot less and I'll explain why there are basically three reasons the first is Dave was unable to explain to me the mass balance meaning how does one account for the greater amount of cholesterol in and the greater number of the LDL particles
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.