Paul Saladino· MD
the key thing with the calcification is absolutely regression as possible amazing stories out there now we've got people with massive cholesterol with zero scores and keen arteries it's a powerful tool
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the key thing with the calcification is absolutely regression as possible amazing stories out there now we've got people with massive cholesterol with zero scores and keen arteries it's a powerful tool
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's really really unusual for the calcium score to go anywhere but up and usually it goes up by 25 30 a year or more with with calcification so it's kind of like we wish our investments you know like the compound interest you know it really it really can accumulate but and i'll have to say i've probably read 150 000 calcium scores in the last 20 years because because and we've probably done 600 000 in our practice and we do 50 or 60 different day so like you virtually never see that