Peter Attia· MD
MRI shows a suspicious lesion three four or five on the three four five you need a biopsy MRI shows sorry independent of PSA density independent of PSA density okay
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
MRI shows a suspicious lesion three four or five on the three four five you need a biopsy MRI shows sorry independent of PSA density independent of PSA density okay
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and if you have a um negative MRI and a low PSA density we'll say you're likely can be monitored
if you have a negative MRI and a and a high PSA density you we will often suggest a biopsy for you
who needs a prostate biopsy somebody who has abnormal blood testing they go on to get an MRI that's our regular pathway