The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and again in cardiovascular disease what are your outcomes it's usually mace a major adverse cardiac event so heart attack stroke revascularization death so you have heart outcomes that's an important thing right they're not tracking nobody cares how much it lowers your cholesterol the biomarker means nothing anymore it's only does it prevent an outcome
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.