The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and sure enough he did drop it substantially um to where it was and I I I'm afraid I'm G to Mis quote his numbers but I know it got down to to like very low 100s I want to say like 112 or something like that and he's Norm up at around like 500 I think he started closer to 400 at the start of the experiment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if he consumes all of these Oreos every single day and he doesn't like Oreos but Oreos were provocative people know what they are and it sounds ridiculous that you could lower your LDL by just adding a whole bunch of Oreos but per the lipid energy model his insulin's going up which means that there's going to be more lioen liase activity induced by the insulin but also repleting his glycogen stores so while he's ketogenic now his glycogen stores are going up therefore the liver is going to feel less of a need to recirculate fat therefore there's going to be less successive vldl uh to LDL conversion