The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
over time we would have seen delamination from the inside out so you are ACC accumulating the delamination but on the outside it was still Christine Peter never knew and the delamination would continue to progress layer upon concentric layer until that day when you were 21 or whatever and the last uh layer was breached and the nuclear gel extruded just a little bit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.