The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if she has a perfect CT angiogram I would you know that would be enough period of exposure you know call it 60 years that I would say you know there's something going on in this woman where you know other factors that are equally important to the lipoprotein the endothelial function the immune response are working enough in her favor that you know she might not need to be managed very aggressively despite the fact that she's there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.