The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we were measuring a college soccer team um across a couple seasons and we would see that during finals week they would look far worse than during tournaments even competitive like uh playoffs just because that stress of being you know in a finals week where you're studying and you're not sleeping and you're you know more stressed out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
from a college standpoint most soccer athletes that we would see in these are female athletes be in the low mid 80s on a you know normal basis and this again this is Morpheus system that's you can't compare these other numbers um but they'd be in the low to mid 8s kind of as a normal range we see them drop into the 50s 60s sometimes even 7 no 70s sometimes down to 50s