We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if the radiation didn't bother you of a whole-body PET CT and of course it should bother you because a whole-body PET CT would be more than 50% of your it'd be probably close to 80% of your annual allotment of radiation right if not home or you'll be quite high and depending on if you live at altitude or where you live right so if you're at sea level you'd probably be allowed one a year maximum if not one every two years yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.